On 4 June, two military judges rejected cases against Salim Hamdan and Omar Khadr on the ground that military commissions did not have jurisdiction over O. Khadr and S. Hamdan, as they had been classified as “enemy combatants” and not “unlawful enemy combatants”. On 4 July, the Pentagon prosecutors filed an appeal in the case of Omar Khadr to the new Court of Military Commissions Review, claiming that the designation of “enemy combatant” is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, and that in any case a military judge can determine the status of “unlawful enemy combatant”.
HRW Press ReleaseRecent News
Tunisia: Mass guilty verdicts and draconian sentences the ultimate travesty of justice in the “Conspiracy Case”
23 Apr 2025- Libya: Stop the crackdown on NGOs supporting migrants, refugees and asylum seekers17 Apr 2025
Eswatini: In the face of ongoing repression of the legal profession, lawyers raise concerns with UN Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers
17 Apr 2025Lebanon: the criminal justice system must not be used to intimidate and harass journalists
16 Apr 2025